Hydropolis workshop in Nanjing, China

The making workshop formed part of Hydropolis – an interdisciplinary spring school, where visiting researchers and professionals from Manchester collaborated with students at Southeast University in Nanjing. The group from Manchester included students and researchers in architecture, planning, infrastructure studies, modern languages and business, as well as recent graduates working in these fields.

After a week of fieldwork visits to water infrastructure and restoration sites in Suzhou, Yangzhou and Nanjing, the participants were divided into groups of 3-4, mixing the visitors with local students.
The groups were given a brief to creatively examine, how water infrastructure mediates relationships between urban space, ecological processes and social activity.
Without extensive discussions, the groups launched into the process.

One group physically conceptualised the millennia-long history of Xuanwu Lake, to the north of Nanjing. In particular, the study examined the different uses and relationships of the city with the lake area, manifest through farming, defence walls, and more recently, tourism infrastructures. This group won many awards at the closing ceremony!

Another group focused on the communities interacting with the Yangtze River, just to the West of the city.

A more abstract model, suspended from above, examined the Yangtze River’s flow through the centuries. Alongside the river, the participants used fishing line to suspend key historic moments (images) and structures (3D printed models).
This group experimented with the issues of water pollution. Their model contrasted the efforts to clean the water bodies with the proliferating ‘coffee culture’, reliant on disposable cups and bottles.
Another model addressed the hidden yet critical role of water infrastructures enabling Nanjing’s metabolism. The group enjoyed using pipes, both literally and metaphorically.
The topics of ecological restorations and resilience were addressed in the model conceptualising the infinite water cycle: with caring and supportive measures on one side contrasted with controlling and exploitative approaches on the other. This group creatively challenged the ongoing hard human-centric interventions (dams/walls) and advocated for transition towards softer ways of supporting water ecosystems, for example with nets and tree planting.

As with my other workshops, at the end of the day the participants were reallocated, so that each team member could present their learnings and next steps to members of other groups. The workshop in Nanjing highlighted additional benefits of a group model making exercise.

As well as a means to brainstorm through making, the workshop acted as an icebreaker for the group members, coming from different backgrounds and cultures.

The collaborative objects mitigated language and disciplinary barriers.

After the main making day, the models remained heavily used for the rest of the spring school, serving as key discussion and demonstration tools during the final day’s presentations and closing ceremony.

Photo from the final day’s ceremony

Leave a comment